2008-2009 Economic Crisis and the Policies Implemented Research Paper

2008-2009 Economic Crisis and the Policies Implemented - Research Paper Example This happens while unemployment and bankruptcies rates go up (Andrews, 2009). Recessions crop up when there is a general drop in expenditure. It follows the rising of an economic bubble or an unpredictable supply shock. Governments respond to recessions through implementing expansionary macroeconomic strategies. They tend to raise the government’s expenditure, increase the money supply and lessen the amount of tax paid by the citizens (Andrews, 2009). In 2007, a global financial predicament rapidly metamorphosed from the satiation of the assets bubble in the United States to the most horrible recession ever witnessed on the planet. This paper will research on the causes of the 2008-2009 economic predicament and the policies executed by various key people liable for saving the U.S. economy. It will also explain the task, constitutional authority, and the policy view of some current holders of key positions that set policies for saving the U.S. economy. In 2007, a worldwide econ omic predicament spread its gloom on the financial outcomes of several nations (Simon, 2001). It ended with what was often termed as the worst recession (Simon, 2001). Its source that originated from the sub-prime segment of the United State real estate field as an isolated turmoil matured into a complete recession in 2007. The old well-known fact that the whole world sneezes when the United States seizes flu seemed to be justified (Baker, 2007). This is because vital economies like Japan and nations in the European Union also went into recession in mid 2008. Generally, 2009 became the first year since the 2nd WW that the world had experienced a recession, a catastrophic over turn of the boom years from 2002 to 2007. The predicament came mainly as a shock to most policymakers, economists, investors and multilateral agencies. The day before the eruption of the economic disaster, Jean Philippe of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) declared that for the O ECD region all together, development is set to go past its potential rate for the rest of 2007 plus 2008. This was held up by optimism in rising market economies and positive financial settings. Following the worldwide recession of 2008 and 2009, the economics line of work has come under a huge deal of disapproval from leading scholars. Economists offer a strong analysis of the economics line of work. They dispute that both implicit and explicit intellectual conspiracies make it hard for the leading members of the job to promote a genuine discussion derived from alternative perspectives (Baker, 2007). These leading members were always allied with selected American universities. The outcome was that a rather restricted intellectual discussion occurred between like-minded scholars. Hence, it does not astonish that, for a great deal of 2008, the harshness of this global recession was underrated. Afterward, leading interpreters, including the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the Wo rld Bank, made several changes to its growth forecasts during 2008 and 2009 as the degree of the crisis developed (Baker, 2007). Causes of the 2008-2009 Economic Crisis There were numerous revealing factors that should have set off alarm bells warning of an upcoming economic recession. A huge majority of officials, academics and financiers, overlooked the signals and instead made plentiful claims about a fresh period. There existed a universal excitement regarding the conditions of the worldwide economy and with a lot of critics saying that time was different. As disputed by this research, there exists, however, numerous connections between the banking crises and previous US sub-prime